Arlo and Swann are both consumer-facing security camera brands available in Australia, but they suit different types of buyers. This guide covers how each brand compares on video quality, storage, smart features, installation, and price.
by Bryce Whitty
Bryce has a background in the security industry and founded ProtectFind as an independent information site.
1
Brand Background
Arlo
Founded in 2014 as a spin-off from Netgear, Arlo is based in California and has carved out a reputation for sleek, wireless security cameras with sharp design and strong app integration. Known for innovation in smart home security, Arlo focuses on user-friendly tech that plays nicely with other smart devices.
Swann
With roots going back to the late 1980s, Swann is an Australian brand that made its name with robust, wired security systems. Now headquartered in Melbourne, Swann offers a broad range of wired and wireless options. It’s especially popular among users looking for multi-camera, expandable setups at an affordable price.
2
Key Features Comparison
Video Quality
Arlo: Offers up to 4K resolution on models like the Arlo Ultra 2. Clear video, great detail.
Swann: Also offers 4K in its higher-end models, though mid-range units may cap out at 1080p.
Power Options
Arlo: Rechargeable batteries with optional solar panel support. Some models support hardwiring.
Swann: Predominantly wired power, with some models offering battery or solar options.
Smart Home Integration
Arlo: Works well with Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple HomeKit.
Swann: Compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant, but lacks HomeKit support.
Storage Options
Arlo: Cloud storage (subscription-based) and some models support local storage via hub.
Swann: Offers local storage via DVR/NVR and optional cloud services.
Motion Detection & AI Features
Arlo: Advanced object detection (people, animals, packages), activity zones, smart alerts.
Swann: Offers heat and motion sensing, with smart alerts available on newer models.
Audio
Arlo: Two-way audio standard on most models.
Swann: Two-way audio available on some models but less consistent.
3
Installation and User-Friendliness
Arlo: Installation is relatively simple—great for renters or those avoiding power tools. Wireless design means less cabling and more flexibility in placement.
Swann: Wired systems can be more time-consuming to install, especially multi-camera DVR setups. Wireless models are available, but their ecosystem leans toward more traditional, fixed installations.
4
Pricing and Value for Money
Arlo: Generally more expensive, especially once you factor in cloud storage subscriptions. That said, it offers top-tier features in compact packages.
Swann: Typically offers more cameras for your dollar, especially in multi-camera kits. Good value if you’re covering a large property or want lots of coverage.
5
Customer Support and Warranty
Arlo: Comes with a 1-year warranty and 90 days of support. Extended support and warranty are available with subscription services.
Swann: Offers a 12-month warranty and 24/7 tech support. Some retailers offer longer warranties on Swann gear.
6
Pros and Cons
Arlo Pros:
Arlo Cons:
Swann Pros:
Swann Cons:
7
Which Brand Tends to Suit Which Buyer
Arlo tends to suit:
Swann tends to suit:
8
Final Thoughts
In the end, choosing between Arlo and Swann comes down to how much tech convenience you want versus how much coverage you need. Arlo shines with smart integrations, clean aesthetics, and wire-free flexibility, making them a good fit for those who want a streamlined system that plays well with other smart gadgets. Swann, on the other hand, offers robust, value-packed systems that are ideal for larger properties or users who prefer a more traditional, set-and-forget security setup. Both brands have their strengths; it’s just a matter of matching those to your priorities.
